pagani design 1645 vs pagani design 1692

The Pagani Design PD-1645 and the Pagani Design PD-1692 represent two distinct styles within the brand's catalogue, with each serving as an homage to a different classic Rolex model. The PD-1645 is a flashier, dress-oriented piece, while the PD-1692 is a more robust, understated sports watch.

Here is a detailed head-to-head comparison of the Pagani Design PD-1645 and PD-1692.


Pagani Design PD-1645 vs. PD-1692: Head-to-Head Comparison

Feature Pagani Design PD-1645 Pagani Design PD-1692
Iconic Homage Rolex Datejust 41 Rolex Explorer / Air-King
Case Diameter 41mm - 42mm 39mm - 40mm
Aesthetic / Bezel Dress / Business, Fluted Bezel (Highly Polished) Sport / Field, Smooth/Polished Bezel (Understated)
Water Resistance 100M (10 BAR) 200M (20 BAR)
Movement Seiko Instruments NH35A Automatic Seiko Instruments NH35A Automatic
Dial Features Date window with 2.5x Cyclops No Date (Clean dial, "3-6-9" Explorer-style or Air-King style markers)
Crystal Sapphire Crystal (Flat with Sapphire Cyclops) Sapphire Crystal (Flat with Anti-Reflective Coating)
Case Back Exhibition (Display) Case Back (often Mineral glass center) Solid Screw-Down Case Back
Typical Price Range ~$70 - $180 (depending on sale/vendor) ~$60 - $150 (depending on sale/vendor)

Detailed Comparison

1. Design & Aesthetics (Homage)

The primary difference is the design inspiration, which dictates the watch's overall style.

  • PD-1645 (The Dress Watch): This model is a faithful homage to the classic Rolex Datejust. It is designed for maximum visual impact. The defining features are the fluted bezel (typically high-polished) and the presence of a date window with a Cyclops magnifier lens over the date. The case and bracelet often feature a mix of polished and brushed surfaces, with some colorways offering two-tone (gold/steel) aesthetics, making it a distinctly formal or business-casual piece.
  • PD-1692 (The Sports/Field Watch): This watch pays tribute to either the Rolex Explorer or the Air-King. It adheres to a minimalist, tool-watch aesthetic. It features a smooth, polished bezel and a clean, no-date dial. This simplicity makes it highly legible and significantly more understated than the PD-1645, suitable for a wider range of casual and rugged environments.

2. Size and Wearability

The sizing of both models is aimed at modern wearability, though the PD-1645 wears larger due to its design.

  • PD-1645: With a diameter of 41-42mm and a noticeable lug-to-lug measurement of approximately 50mm, the PD-1645 is the larger of the two. The fluted bezel and Cyclops also add to its visual presence. Its thickness is slender at about 11.5mm to 12mm, allowing it to slide easily under a shirt cuff.
  • PD-1692: At 39-40mm in diameter and a thickness of 11.6mm to 12mm, the PD-1692 is the more compact and universally wearable watch. The simpler, smooth case profile and smaller visual footprint make it an excellent choice for smaller wrists or those who prefer a more traditional sports watch fit.

3. Practicality and Performance (Water Resistance & Case Back)

This is the most significant practical difference between the two models.

  • PD-1692 (Superior Performance): This model is classified as a robust tool watch with 200M (20 BAR) water resistance. This rating, combined with a solid screw-down case back, makes it genuinely suitable for swimming, snorkeling, and light diving. The solid case back provides greater security for the movement and better depth rating.
  • PD-1645 (Daily Wear): The PD-1645 is rated at 100M (10 BAR) water resistance. This is suitable for general wear, showering, and swimming, but it is not classified for serious diving. It features an exhibition case back (often mineral glass), which, while attractive for viewing the NH35A movement, is generally less pressure-resistant than a solid back.

4. Movement and Crystal

Both watches share the same core engine and crystal material, ensuring similar base performance.

  • Movement: Both use the reliable Seiko NH35A Japanese automatic movement, featuring 24 jewels, hacking (second hand stops when crown is pulled), and hand-winding capability. This workhorse movement offers a power reserve of around 40-42 hours.
  • Crystal: Both models feature a scratch-resistant Sapphire Crystal. The PD-1692 explicitly lists an Anti-Reflective (AR) coating for better visibility in harsh light, which is crucial for a tool watch. The PD-1645's prominent feature is the Sapphire Cyclops magnifier over the date window.

Pros and Cons

Model Pros Cons
Pagani Design PD-1645 • Fluted bezel offers a striking, luxury aesthetic. • Date function with Cyclops for practical utility. • Slender case thickness (11.5-12mm). • Exhibition case back allows viewing of the movement. • Lower 100M water resistance. • Fluted bezel is a scratch and ding magnet. • Visually wears larger (41-42mm).
Pagani Design PD-1692 • Superior 200M water resistance for all water activities. • More versatile, understated, and rugged aesthetic. • Compact, highly wearable size (39-40mm). • Clean, highly legible no-date dial. • No date function (less daily utility). • Solid case back means the movement cannot be viewed. • Less 'flashy' appearance (smooth bezel).

Conclusion: Who Should Buy What?

The choice between the PD-1645 and the PD-1692 comes down entirely to style preference and intended use.

Buy the Pagani Design PD-1645 if:

  • You want a flashy, dressier watch with a luxury aesthetic.
  • You love the iconic look of the fluted bezel and the Cyclops date magnifier.
  • You prioritize the date function in your daily watch.
  • Your primary use is for business, office, or formal events, and swimming/diving is not a requirement.
  • You prefer a watch with a modern, larger wrist presence (41-42mm).

Buy the Pagani Design PD-1692 if:

  • You prefer a rugged, tool-watch aesthetic that is simple and understated.
  • You require superior water resistance (200M) for serious water activities or as a true "beater" watch.
  • You prefer a clean, highly legible dial without the visual clutter of a date window.
  • You have a smaller wrist or prefer a more classic/compact size (39-40mm).
  • You want an "everyday watch" (GADA: Go Anywhere, Do Anything) that can seamlessly transition from the office to the outdoors.

← Kembali ke Arsip